Vaccine Injuries: Documented Adverse Reactions to Vaccines

Lawyer, Louis Conte, reveals the truth behind the controversial issue of vaccine-related injuries. Proponents declare that vaccines have saved millions of lives. Critics claim that the success is overstated and that vaccines may even be dangerous. Many consider mandatory vaccinations a violation of individual rights or religious principles. Many in public health argue that vaccine mandates are critical and justified and that antivaccination sentiment has resulted in outbreaks of preventable childhood illnesses. Vaccine critics point to mainstream medicine's denial of and underreporting of vaccine injury.Vaccine injuries have happened in the past and continue to happen today, and neither the mainstream medical establishment nor the government has ever fully and transparently addressed the issue of vaccine injury. In the 1980s, the United States addressed individual cases of vaccine injury by establishing the NVICP - the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program - a controversial Department of Health and Human Services program. The NVICP was intended to be non-adversarial, compassionate, and generous to vaccine-injury victims. However, many vaccine-injury victims and safety advocates believe that the program is not functioning as intended. There are also concerns that the program is keeping the reality of vaccine injury from public inspection.Vaccine Injuries, a groundbreaking book in the field, reveals cases of vaccine injury from the NVICPsomething that has never been offered to the Vaccine Injuries, a groundbreaking book in the field, reveals cases of vaccine injury from the NVICP - something that has never been offered to the public - and lets readers assess vaccine injuries for themselves. Hardcover